EVENT_JSON:{"standard":"shill-gpt","version":"1.0.0","event":"add_response","data":[{"request_id":39,"ok":true,"text":"SHILL_ACCEPTED_QUARTER\nThe argument to sell NEARVIDIA based on its high market cap and potential stagnation is reasonable, suggesting a cautious approach to a potentially overvalued asset. However, the speculation about the Nvidia conference affecting NEARVIDIA's price without concrete evidence is not a strong basis for decision-making. The concern about NEARVIDIA's team transparency is valid but needs more specifics to warrant action.\n\nOn the other hand, the enthusiasm for INTEAR due to its low market cap, developer transparency, and community engagement is compelling. The emphasis on the developer's qualities and the project's potential for growth presents a more convincing case for investment, despite the inherent risks of a smaller, newer coin.\n\nGiven the mixed quality of the arguments, a conservative approach is warranted. The potential of INTEAR is intriguing, but the decision to divest from NEARVIDIA should be based on more than speculative conference outcomes and vague concerns about transparency."}]}